Back to episodes
Is Lovable Just Hype? Lovable vs Cursor
This episode is in Finnish. The video below is the original recording; this page provides an English summary for easier reading.
Summary
Aksel and Mikki on AI in UX work: Figma Make, Lovable vs Cursor, faster iteration, and whether you can work without AI tools.
About The Good Side in this episode
Aksel Suokas is a UX designer at The Good Side working actively with AI tools. The episode covers Figma Make for fast prototypes and AI for interview analysis, so designers focus where they are strongest.
Key discussion points
- AI in UX: Figma Make has been one of the most disruptive tools recently
- Lovable is mostly hype for serious work; Cursor is better for real development
- AI improves quality: faster iteration leads to better outcomes
- AI analysis of user interviews saves time and surfaces patterns
- Clickable prototypes deepen conversations with stakeholders
- Viikon Pikseli: can you work without AI?
Questions & answers
- What is the difference between Lovable and Cursor?
- Lovable is a no-code tool whose output is close to Figma Make plus Lovable-style flows. Cursor is a code editor suited to serious product development. Lovable fits quick prototypes; Cursor fits real engineering.
- Does AI improve the quality of UX work?
- Yes. AI speeds the process so designers can spend more time on details and strengths. More iteration rounds usually mean a better final product.
- How does Figma Make change design work?
- It enables fast prototypes and iteration. Conversations with stakeholders and developers go deeper when there is something clickable in the room. Designers focus on problem-solving instead of manual layout grind.
Topics: AI UX design, Figma Make, Lovable, Cursor, design prototype, The Good Side, Behind the Pixels, AI design tools, UX workflow